Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-08-30 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.24 x 2.97 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a lot better than HTC U12 Life, with a score of 94.6 against 74.4. Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a notably newer and somewhat thinner phone than HTC U12 Life, although it's incredibly heavier. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the older 11 version and HTC U12 Life has Android 8.1 Oreo.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a superior CPU than HTC U12 Life, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little more vivid screen than HTC U12 Life, because although it has a bit worse display pixels density, it also counts with a bigger screen and a higher resolution of 1768 x 2208px.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has just a bit better camera than HTC U12 Life, because although it has a camera in the back with a lot lower resolution and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low-light photography. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than HTC U12 Life, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has superior battery life than HTC U12 Life, because it has a 25% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.