Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2023-05-18 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.56 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Coffee Black and Snow White | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 SM7450-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 644 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50s is much better than HTC U23 Pro, getting a general score of 86.6 against 77.8. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A50s has older 10 version while HTC U23 Pro has Android 13. Samsung Galaxy A50s is an a lot older cellphone than the HTC U23 Pro, but Samsung could make it somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner.
The Galaxy A50s counts with a very superior hardware performance than HTC U23 Pro, although it has 6 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy A50s has just a bit better screen than HTC U23 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a quite greater number of pixels per inch in the screen.
Galaxy A50s takes a lot better photographs and videos than HTC U23 Pro, although it has a lot less megapixels resolution camera. Galaxy A50s counts with just a bit more storage capacity to install applications and games than HTC U23 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB.
HTC U23 Pro features a bit better battery duration than Galaxy A50s, because it has a 4600mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.