Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 60.8 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 4.0.3, 2.3.4 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2011-10-31 | 2022-02-25 |
| 5.07 x 2.64 x 0.44 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 799.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 245 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Multi-touch |
| 7.4 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S3 APQ8060 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Scorpion (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 220 (266 MHz) GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.01 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.72 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (60 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.48 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1620mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 293 hours standby time 4.6 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.44 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 is a lot better than the HTC Vivid 4G, getting a 93.4 score against 60.8. These phones come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy S22 has the older 13 version while HTC Vivid 4G has Android 4.0.3. Galaxy S22 is a incredibly newer cellphone, and it is also a little lighter and notably thinner than HTC Vivid 4G.
The Galaxy S22 has a quite superior hardware performance than HTC Vivid 4G, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with more RAM memory and 6 more processing cores. Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a way better looking display than HTC Vivid 4G, because it has a much better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, a much greater pixels count per inch of display and a lot bigger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a much better storage capacity to store more games and applications than HTC Vivid 4G, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 112 GB more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a way better camera than HTC Vivid 4G, because it has a camera in the back with a much better resolution and a much better 7680x4320 video resolution.
The Galaxy S22 features a very superior battery performance than HTC Vivid 4G, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S22 costs exactly the same than HTC Vivid 4G, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.