Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-08-22 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.17 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Sapphire blue | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.93 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is much better than HTC Wildfire X, with an 83.8 score against 72.7. Galaxy A50's design is just a little heavier but just a little bit thinner than HTC Wildfire X, and both of them were released only 5 months apart. Samsung Galaxy A50 has a much better looking display than HTC Wildfire X, because it has a bit bigger display, a way better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a higher screen density.
The Galaxy A50 counts with a little bit more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC Wildfire X, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Galaxy A50 also has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A50 features a bit superior processor than HTC Wildfire X. They have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with improved battery performance than HTC Wildfire X, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh. Galaxy A50 counts with a greater camera than HTC Wildfire X, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A50 also has a lot higher resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.