Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-08-22 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.17 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Sapphire blue | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.93 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50s is better than the HTC Wildfire X, with a score of 86.6 against 72.7. Both devices in our current comparison come with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A50s has older 10 version and HTC Wildfire X has Android 9.0 Pie. Although Samsung Galaxy A50s and HTC Wildfire X were released with only a couple months difference, Samsung Galaxy A50s's body is a bit heavier but also just a little thinner than HTC Wildfire X.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s has a bit faster CPU than HTC Wildfire X, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A50s features a sharper screen than HTC Wildfire X, because it has a lot higher 1080 x 2340 resolution, more pixels per inch in the screen and a little larger screen.
Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a bit more storage for games and applications than HTC Wildfire X, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has a SD memory slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Galaxy A50s has better battery lifetime than HTC Wildfire X, because it has a 21 percent larger battery capacity.
The Galaxy A50s takes way better videos and photos than HTC Wildfire X, because it has a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a back camera with lot more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.