Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-08-22 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.17 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Sapphire blue | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.93 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way better than HTC Wildfire X, having a 98.9 score against 72.7. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra design is newer than HTC Wildfire X's, but it's just a little bit thicker and a lot heavier. These devices have Android operating system, but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the previous 13 version and HTC Wildfire X has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much better looking display than HTC Wildfire X, because it has a much greater quantity of pixels per inch in the display, a little bit bigger display and a way higher 1440 x 3088 resolution. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a quite bigger memory capacity for games and applications than HTC Wildfire X, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a little faster CPU than HTC Wildfire X, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features better battery life than HTC Wildfire X, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a lot better camera than HTC Wildfire X, because it has a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a much higher resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.