Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-08-22 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.17 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Sapphire blue | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.93 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 edge is a bit better than HTC Wildfire X, with a score of 78.1 against 72.7. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS, but the Galaxy S7 edge has an older 8.0 Oreo version and HTC Wildfire X has Android 9.0 Pie version. Galaxy S7 edge is an noticeably older cellphone than HTC Wildfire X, but Samsung managed to build it just a little bit lighter and just a little thinner.
HTC Wildfire X features a little better performance than Galaxy S7 edge, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the HTC Wildfire X also has a greater number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy S7 edge features a much better looking display than HTC Wildfire X, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a much better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a lot higher pixel density.
The HTC Wildfire X counts with a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 256 GB and 96 GB more internal storage capacity. Galaxy S7 edge takes way better videos and photos than HTC Wildfire X, and although they both have a same resolution camera, the Galaxy S7 edge also has a way higher 3840x2160 video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 edge features just a little bit longer battery duration than HTC Wildfire X, because it has a 3600mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.