Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 55.6 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Windows Phone 8 | -- |
| 2012-09-19 | 2019-03-15 |
| 4.74 x 2.48 x 0.40 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 3.99 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gray and Red | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 199.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 233 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8627 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 305 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 7.92 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 35.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1700mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 3.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 is much better than the HTC Windows Phone 8S, getting a score of 83.8 against 55.6. The Samsung Galaxy A50 is a incredibly newer and thinner phone than the HTC Windows Phone 8S, but it's notably heavier. The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a much better looking display than HTC Windows Phone 8S, because it has a really larger display, a much higher 1080 x 2340px resolution and way more pixels per inch in the screen.
Galaxy A50 features a quite better processing power than HTC Windows Phone 8S, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with a larger number of cores and a higher amount of RAM memory. Galaxy A50 captures a lot better videos and photos than HTC Windows Phone 8S, because it has a lot better 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, a lot larger aperture to capture better low-light captures and a lot higher 25 mega pixels resolution camera in the back.
The Galaxy A50 features a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than HTC Windows Phone 8S, because it has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a very superior battery duration than HTC Windows Phone 8S, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 1700mAh.
Galaxy A50 costs a little more than HTC Windows Phone 8S, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.