Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Huawei | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2018-10-26 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.21 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black, Emerald green and Twilight | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 549.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 537 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 980 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP10 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Huawei Mate 20 Pro has a score of 82.9, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's 80.1 score. Huawei Mate 20 Pro's construction is much lighter and way thinner than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, even though it was released only 18 months before. Galaxy XCover FieldPro features just a bit better display than Huawei Mate 20 Pro, because although it has a lot smaller screen and a little bit worse resolution of 1440 x 2560px, it also counts with a bit more pixels per display inch.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's CPU is just as good as Huawei Mate 20 Pro's processing unit, and although the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. The Huawei Mate 20 Pro captures way better videos and photos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light images, it also counts with a camera in the back with a much better resolution, a way larger sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photos and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Huawei Mate 20 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features just a bit better battery lifetime than Huawei Mate 20 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
The Huawei Mate 20 Pro not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.