Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Huawei | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2018-11-16 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.21 x 2.85 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| -- | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP10 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 is just a bit better than the Huawei Mate 20 RS Porsche Design, with a 90.7 score against 87.7. The Samsung Galaxy A52 construction is a lot newer and somewhat thinner, but a little bit heavier than the Huawei Mate 20 RS Porsche Design. Huawei Mate 20 RS Porsche Design counts with a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy A52, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Huawei Mate 20 RS Porsche Design also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Huawei Mate 20 RS Porsche Design features a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3120px resolution and more pixels per screen inch. The Huawei Mate 20 RS Porsche Design counts with a bigger storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy A52 features a lot better camera than Huawei Mate 20 RS Porsche Design, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same camera sensor size, the same (4K) video quality and a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy A52 also has a camera with a much higher 64 megapixels resolution. The Galaxy A52 has a bit better battery performance than Huawei Mate 20 RS Porsche Design, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.