Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.9 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Huawei | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-10-22 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.41 x 2.97 x 0.36 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black and Mystic silver | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2772 x 1334 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 452 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 9000 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A77 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3130 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali G78 MP24 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.78 inches (1/1.28") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Huawei Mate 40 Pro has a general score of 90.9, which is a bit better than the Motorola Moto G200 5G's global score of 86.2. Although it's the best cellphone in this comparison review, the Huawei Mate 40 Pro construction is older, just a bit thicker and just a little heavier than the Motorola Moto G200 5G. Both devices in this review come with Android operating system, but Huawei Mate 40 Pro has the older 10 version while Motorola Moto G200 5G has Android 11.
Huawei Mate 40 Pro counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Moto G200 5G. They have 8 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core processor. The Huawei Mate 40 Pro has a little more vivid display than Moto G200 5G, and although they both have a same size display, the Huawei Mate 40 Pro also has a just a bit higher pixels density and a slightly better 1334 x 2772 pixels resolution.
Huawei Mate 40 Pro takes just a bit better videos and photos than Motorola Moto G200 5G, although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a back-facing camera with a way lower 50 mega pixels resolution, they both have a same size aperture. Huawei Mate 40 Pro features a much greater memory for games and applications than Moto G200 5G, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Moto G200 5G counts with just a bit better battery life than Huawei Mate 40 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.