Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Huawei | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2015-12-01 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.19 x 3.17 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Metal | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 690.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 950 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP4 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.42 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.35 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is better than Huawei Mate 8, getting an 87.1 score against 77.4. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's design is extremely newer than Huawei Mate 8's, although it is just a little bit thicker and a bit heavier. The Huawei Mate 8 has a much faster processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much better screen than Huawei Mate 8, because it has a little bigger display, a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little more pixels per inch of screen. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Huawei Mate 8, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots much clearer videos and photos than Huawei Mate 8, because it has a much better 3840x2160 video quality, a larger camera aperture for better low light photography and videos and a back facing camera with much more mega pixels. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a bit superior battery duration than Huawei Mate 8, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.