Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Huawei | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2017-01-31 | 2020-04-04 |
| 5.98 x 2.95 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black | Black |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 534 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 960 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP8 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Huawei Mate 9 Porsche Design has a general score of 82.7, which is a little bit better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro's 80.1 general score. The Huawei Mate 9 Porsche Design is an notably older device than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, but Huawei was able to build it much lighter and thinner. Both of these phones work with the same Android 8.0 Oreo operating system, so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding that.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little more vivid screen than Huawei Mate 9 Porsche Design, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro also counts with a little higher pixels density.
The Huawei Mate 9 Porsche Design has more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. Galaxy XCover FieldPro has just a little better performance than Huawei Mate 9 Porsche Design, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Huawei Mate 9 Porsche Design has a better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier sensor capturing less light and washed colors and a way tinier aperture, and they both have a same resolution back camera, the Huawei Mate 9 Porsche Design also counts with a lot better video definition.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little better battery duration than Huawei Mate 9 Porsche Design, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.