Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.7 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Huawei | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat | Android 11 |
| 2017-01-10 | 2020-11-19 |
| 5.98 x 2.95 x 0.30 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Clearly white and Just black |
| Metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 775.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP8 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has an overall score of 87.5, which is much better than the Huawei Mate 9 Pro's score of 78.7. These devices work with Android OS, but Google Pixel 4a 5G has the older 11 version while Huawei Mate 9 Pro has Android 8.0 Oreo. Even though the Google Pixel 4a 5G is just a little thicker than Huawei Mate 9 Pro, it's just a little bit lighter and also extremely newer.
Google Pixel 4a 5G's processing unit is very similar to the processor in Huawei Mate 9 Pro, both of them have 8 processing cores and a 6 GB RAM. The Huawei Mate 9 Pro has a slightly better display than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater display pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560.
Google Pixel 4a 5G shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Huawei Mate 9 Pro, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a much bigger aperture to capture better low light images and video, a back camera with a better resolution, higher video frame rate and a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing higher quality photographs and videos.
The Huawei Mate 9 Pro and the Google Pixel 4a 5G count with incredibly similar storage capacity to store more games and applications, they have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory. The Huawei Mate 9 Pro has a bit superior battery performance than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 3 percent greater battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is not only the best devices in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, making it very easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.