Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.7 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Huawei | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat | -- |
| 2017-01-10 | 2020-05-15 |
| 5.98 x 2.95 x 0.30 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 775.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP8 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is much better than Huawei Mate 9 Pro, with a general score of 87.1 against 78.7. LG Velvet is a newer cellphone than Huawei Mate 9 Pro, although it's a bit thicker and just a little heavier. The Huawei Mate 9 Pro counts with a little more vivid display than LG Velvet, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better count of pixels per inch of display and a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 2560.
The LG Velvet's processing unit is just as good as the processor in Huawei Mate 9 Pro, both have a 6 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core processor. The LG Velvet features a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Huawei Mate 9 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the LG Velvet also has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB.
LG Velvet counts with a better camera than Huawei Mate 9 Pro, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the LG Velvet also has a bigger aperture to capture better low-light photography and video, a lot higher 48 MP resolution camera and a much larger camera sensor taking much higher quality videos and pictures.
The LG Velvet counts with just a little better battery performance than Huawei Mate 9 Pro, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, LG Velvet is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.