Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.7 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Huawei | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-01-10 | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.98 x 2.95 x 0.30 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| $ 775.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP8 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is better than the Huawei Mate 9 Pro, with a global score of 87 against 78.7. Both phones we are comparing here include Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola razr (2020) has the older 11 version and Huawei Mate 9 Pro has Android 8.0 Oreo version. The Motorola razr (2020) construction is incredibly newer than the Huawei Mate 9 Pro's, although it's heavier and a little bit thicker.
Huawei Mate 9 Pro has a brighter screen than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher screen pixel density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. The Motorola razr (2020) has just a bit better performance than Huawei Mate 9 Pro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has more RAM memory.
Motorola razr (2020) has a lot better camera than Huawei Mate 9 Pro, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a much larger camera sensor, a much better resolution camera and a way bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light photography and videos.
Motorola razr (2020) counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Huawei Mate 9 Pro, because it has more internal storage capacity. The Huawei Mate 9 Pro features a much longer battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh.
The Motorola razr (2020) is a lot more expensive than the Huawei Mate 9 Pro, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.