Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.7 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Huawei | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat | -- |
| 2017-01-10 | 2018-04-03 |
| 5.98 x 2.95 x 0.30 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Black and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 775.00 | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP8 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a general score of 83.8, which is a bit better than the Huawei Mate 9 Pro's general score of 78.7. Although the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is newer than the Huawei Mate 9 Pro, it's just a bit thicker and somewhat heavier. The Huawei Mate 9 Pro counts with just a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better display density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a superior storage to store more apps and games than Huawei Mate 9 Pro, because it has more internal memory. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has just a bit better performance than Huawei Mate 9 Pro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s also has more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features a bit better camera than Huawei Mate 9 Pro, and although they both have a same resolution camera in the back, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s also has a larger aperture for better images and video in low-light environments and a larger back camera sensor capturing better quality videos and pictures.
The Huawei Mate 9 Pro has better battery life than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3400mAh.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is also very cheap compared to the other phones, making it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.