Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Huawei | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-01-06 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.18 x 3.11 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Brown, Gold, Gray, Silver and White | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Metal | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP8 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 7.92 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is much better than Huawei Mate 9, getting a general score of 87.1 against 73.4. Although the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is way newer than the Huawei Mate 9, it is just a little bit thicker and a bit heavier. Huawei Mate 9 features a much faster processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much better looking display than Huawei Mate 9, because it has a bit bigger display, a slightly higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a little bit greater display density. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Huawei Mate 9, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has just a bit better battery performance than Huawei Mate 9, because it has a 13% greater battery size. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots much better pictures and videos than Huawei Mate 9, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a lot better 50 MP resolution camera in the back, a way bigger aperture to take better low-light photography and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.