Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.1 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Huawei | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-02-25 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.37 x 5.74 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 10.41 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black, Crystal Blue, Crystal Pink and White | Black |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Plastic |
| $ 2785.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | -- |
| 414 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Kirin 9000 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Cortex-A77@3.13 GHz + 3 x Cortex-A77@2.54 GHz + 4 x Cortex-A55@2.05 GHz, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3130 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G78 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.22 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Huawei Mate X2 is better than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, having an 89.1 score against 80.1. Huawei Mate X2's construction is newer and thinner than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's, but it's also heavier. Both phones we are comparing here work with Android operating system, but Huawei Mate X2 has older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Huawei Mate X2 has a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Huawei Mate X2 also has a larger amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit sharper display than Huawei Mate X2, because although it has a quite lower 1440 x 2560 resolution and a much smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch.
Huawei Mate X2 counts with a greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a battery life that is just as good as Huawei Mate X2's battery lifetime.
The Huawei Mate X2 has a lot better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a much smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for capturing photographs and video in low light situations, it also counts with a much better video resolution and a back camera with way more MP.
Although Huawei Mate X2 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy XCover FieldPro. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Huawei Mate X2, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.