Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 35.6 | 38.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Karbonn | Nokia |
| Android 2.2 | Symbian 9.3 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2008-02-11 |
| 4.20 x 2.33 x 0.55 inches | 4.25 x 1.85 x 0.59 inches |
| 3.70 ounces | 3.17 ounces |
| Black | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | $ 95.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.8 inches | 2.2 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) |
| TFT | TFT |
| 143 pixels per inch | 182 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive | No touch screen |
| 5.8 | 6.5 |
| processor | ARM11 (Single-Core 369 MHz) processor |
| -- | 128 MB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP1 (320 MHz) GPU | GPU |
| 5.94 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 122,88 MB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC external memory slot |
| 2.5 | 0.6 |
| Camera | |
| 3.20 MP | 5.00 MP |
| -- | 640 x 480 (30 fps) (VGA) video resolution |
| 5.06 | 6.05 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 3.9 | 0.9 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1100mAh Battery | 900mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 250 hours standby time 4.2 hours talk time | 250 hours standby time 3.5 hours talk time |
| 2.72 | 2.4 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 2.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
Comparison review
Nokia 6220 classic is a bit better than the Karbonn A1, with a 38.9 score against 35.6. The Nokia 6220 classic is a just a little thicker but somewhat lighter cellphone than the Karbonn A1. Nokia 6220 classic has Symbian 9.3 OS, and Karbonn A1 counts with Android 2.2 OS. Nokia 6220 classic has a bit better processor than Karbonn A1, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with a larger number of cores (and faster).
The Nokia 6220 classic features a brighter display than Karbonn A1, because although it has a really smaller display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 320 x 240, the Nokia 6220 classic also counts with a higher pixels density. The Nokia 6220 classic has a better camera than Karbonn A1, because it has a much more megapixels camera in the back.
Karbonn A1 features a much better memory for games and applications than Nokia 6220 classic, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 3,88 GB more internal storage capacity. Karbonn A1 has greater battery performance than Nokia 6220 classic, because it has a 22% bigger battery capacity.
The Nokia 6220 classic not only is the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.