Compare phones
Motorola DROID Turbo
32 GB Metalized Fiber| Global Score | |
| 44.5 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Karbonn | Motorola |
| Android 4.1 | Android 4.4.4 |
| -- | 2014-10-28 |
| 4.88 x 2.54 x 0.40 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.42 inches |
| 4.06 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black and White | Gray and Red |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 233 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6577 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Dual-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| PowerVR SGX531u GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 7.56 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 524,29 MB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 2.42 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 5.94 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1400mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 168 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.12 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola DROID Turbo is way better than Karbonn A10, with a global score of 76.4 against 44.5. Both devices we are comparing here work with Android operating system, but Motorola DROID Turbo has newer 4.4.4 version while Karbonn A10 has Android 4.1 version. Even being the best in this comparison review, Motorola DROID Turbo's body is notably heavier and a bit thicker than the Karbonn A10.
The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a much faster processing unit than Karbonn A10, because it has a larger number of cores, an additional graphics processing unit and a higher amount of RAM. The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a way better display than Karbonn A10, because it has a lot better pixel density, a bigger screen and a way higher resolution of 2560 x 1440.
The Motorola DROID Turbo has a very superior camera than Karbonn A10, because it has a way more mega-pixels camera in the back. Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a very superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Karbonn A10, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 32 GB internal memory capacity.
The Motorola DROID Turbo has a superior battery duration than Karbonn A10, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity.
Motorola DROID Turbo costs a bit more money than Karbonn A10, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.