Search


Compare phones

Motorola DROID Turbo

32 GB Metalized Fiber
Global Score
44.276.4
Basic Information
KarbonnMotorola
Android 4.2Android 4.4.4
--2014-10-28
4.97 x 2.52 x 0.43 inches5.65 x 2.89 x 0.42 inches
--5.96 ounces
Black and WhiteGray and Red
--Scratch-Resistant Glass
$ 155.00$ 158.00
Display / Screen
4 inches5.2 inches
--1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K)
--AMOLED
233 pixels per inch565 pixels per inch
Capacitive, Multi-touchCapacitive, Multi-touch
6.99.7
Performance
--Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset
Dual-Core 1300 MHz processorKrait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor
512 MB RAM3 GB (800 MHz) RAM
Yes GPUAdreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU
7.929.54
Storage
4 GB internal memory32 GB internal memory
microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slotNo SD card slot
3.825.8
Camera
5.00 MP20.70 MP + 2.00 MP
--f/2.00 aperture
--3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution
--1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video
5.59.9
Networks
Wi-FiWi-Fi
--Mobile Hotspot
UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSMLTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA
SIM, Dual SIMNano SIM
2.96.6
Battery Life
1350mAh Battery3900mAh Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
168 hours standby time
5 hours talk time
--
3.125.84
Other Features
BluetoothBluetooth 4.0
GPSGPS
--NFC
--Infra-red port
Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity SensorAccelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor
FM Radio--

Comparison review

Motorola DROID Turbo has a global score of 76.4, which is a lot better than Karbonn A16's general score of 44.2. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola DROID Turbo has the newer 4.4.4 version and Karbonn A16 has Android 4.2 version. Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a much more powerful processor than Karbonn A16, because it has a larger amount of RAM, more CPU cores and an extra graphics processing unit.

The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a way better screen than Karbonn A16, because it has a bigger screen and a way greater pixels amount per inch of display. Motorola DROID Turbo has a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Karbonn A16, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.

Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a much better battery lifetime than Karbonn A16, because it has a 3900mAh battery size. The Motorola DROID Turbo has a very superior camera than Karbonn A16, because it has a camera in the back with a lot higher 20.7 megapixels resolution.

Motorola DROID Turbo costs a bit more than Karbonn A16, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.