Search


Compare phones

Global Score
39.441.9
Basic Information
KarbonnSamsung
Android 4.0--
--2012-11-29
4.88 x 2.50 x 0.49 inches4.10 x 2.10 x 0.80 inches
3.88 ounces4.70 ounces
Black and White--
$ 155.00$ 105.00
Display / Screen
4 inches2.4 inches
480 x 800 pixels 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
233 pixels per inch167 pixels per inch
Capacitive, Multi-touchNo touch screen
7.16.1
Performance
--STE PNX6809L chipset
Single-Core 1000 MHz processor Single-Core 468 MHz processor
--128 MB RAM
Yes GPU GPU
7.26.57
Storage
--262,14 MB internal memory
microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot
1.322.12
Camera
3.20 MP3.00 MP
5.065.06
Networks
Wi-Fi--
Mobile Hotspot--
EDGE, GPRS and GSMHSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM
SIM, Dual SIMSIM
3.41
Battery Life
1750mAh Battery1300mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
120 hours standby time
3.5 hours talk time
480 hours standby time
9 hours talk time
3.63.04
Other Features
BluetoothBluetooth 2.1, EDR
GPSGPS
Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor--
FM Radio--

Comparison review

The Samsung Rugby III has a general score of 41.9, which is a bit better than the Karbonn A2+'s 39.4 global score. Although it's the best in this comparison, Samsung Rugby III's body is somewhat heavier and incredibly thicker than Karbonn A2+. Karbonn A2+ has a more vivid screen than Samsung Rugby III, because it has a much higher resolution of 800 x 480px, a really larger display and a better screen pixel density.

The Karbonn A2+ features a little better processing power than Samsung Rugby III. Both of them have 1 CPU cores. The Samsung Rugby III counts with a much better memory capacity to install games and applications than Karbonn A2+. Both have a SD extension slot that allows up to 32 GB. Samsung Rugby III's camera is just as good as the camera in Karbonn A2+, although the Samsung Rugby III has a back facing camera with a lower resolution.

Karbonn A2+ has longer battery life than Samsung Rugby III, because it has 1750mAh of battery capacity instead of 1300mAh.

Even being the best phone in our comparison, Samsung Rugby III is also by far the cheapest one, which makes this phone an obvious call.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.