Compare phones
Motorola DROID Turbo
32 GB Metalized Fiber| Global Score | |
| 40.1 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Karbonn | Motorola |
| Android 4.0 | Android 4.4.4 |
| -- | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.75 x 3.09 x 0.41 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.42 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black and White | Gray and Red |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 187 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Dual-Core 1000 MHz processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| -- | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 7.47 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 1.32 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 5.5 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.4 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 300 hours standby time 6 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo has a global score of 76.4, which is much better than Karbonn A25's 40.1 overall score. Even being the best cellphone in this comparison review, the Motorola DROID Turbo construction is somewhat heavier and a bit thicker than Karbonn A25. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola DROID Turbo has the newer 4.4.4 version while Karbonn A25 has Android 4.0 version, providing a lot of extra features and enhanced performance.
Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a way better looking display than Karbonn A25, because it has a much higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels, a little larger screen and a much greater number of pixels per inch of display. The Motorola DROID Turbo features a really superior processing power than Karbonn A25, because it has a greater number of cores and an additional GPU.
The Motorola DROID Turbo features a very superior memory capacity for applications and games than Karbonn A25, although it has no slot for an SD memory card. Motorola DROID Turbo features a greater camera than Karbonn A25, because it has a back camera with much more mega-pixels. Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Karbonn A25, because it has a 95% greater battery capacity.
Motorola DROID Turbo is a bit more expensive than the Karbonn A25, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.