Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 40.1 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Karbonn | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.0 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-11-27 |
| 5.75 x 3.09 x 0.41 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black and White | Cool blue, Power black and Yellow |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 187 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 6.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Dual-Core 1000 MHz processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| -- | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 7.47 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 1.32 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 5.5 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 300 hours standby time 6 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco M3 is a lot better than Karbonn A25, getting a 78.2 score against 40.1. The Xiaomi Poco M3 is a a little bit thinner but noticeably heavier cellphone than the Karbonn A25. These devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Poco M3 has the newer 10 version while Karbonn A25 has Android 4.0 version, so it offers some additional features.
Xiaomi Poco M3 features a much better screen than Karbonn A25, because it has a much greater pixel quantity per inch of screen, a larger screen and a lot higher 1080 x 2340px resolution. Xiaomi Poco M3 has a superior memory to install applications and games than Karbonn A25, because it has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Xiaomi Poco M3 features a very superior processing unit than Karbonn A25, because it has a greater number of cores. The Xiaomi Poco M3 has a very superior camera than Karbonn A25, because it has a much more mega pixels camera. Xiaomi Poco M3 counts with a superior battery duration than Karbonn A25, because it has a 6000mAh battery size instead of 2000mAh.
Xiaomi Poco M3 is not only the best devices in this comparison, but it's also cheap compared to the Karbonn A25, which makes this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.