Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 24.3 | 25.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Karbonn | Motorola |
| -- | 2008-01-07 |
| -- | 3.70 x 1.70 x 0.60 inches |
| -- | 3.30 ounces |
| $ 155.00 | $ 100.00 |
| -- | 128 x 128 pixels |
| -- | STN |
| 187 pixels per inch | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.7 | 3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| EDGE and GPRS | GPRS and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| -- | 940mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 450 hours standby time 9 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.48 |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola W270 has an overall score of 25.6, which is a bit better than Karbonn A27+'s overall score of 24.3. The Karbonn A27+ has a much more vibrant display than Motorola W270. Motorola W270 has as much storage for apps and games as Karbonn A27+. Motorola W270's processor is just as good as Karbonn A27+'s processing unit, both of them have 0 cores.
The Motorola W270's camera is just as good as the camera in Karbonn A27+. Motorola W270 counts with a way better battery performance than Karbonn A27+.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Motorola W270 is also by far the cheapest, which makes it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.