Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 24.3 | 26 |
| Basic Information | |
| Karbonn | Nokia |
| -- | 2005-06-03 |
| -- | 4.09 x 1.77 x 0.67 inches |
| -- | 3.00 ounces |
| $ 155.00 | $ 100.00 |
| -- | 96 x 68 pixels |
| 187 pixels per inch | 65 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.7 | 4.6 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| EDGE and GPRS | GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0.4 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| -- | 900mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 450 hours standby time 5.5 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.4 |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Nokia 1600 is slightly better than the Karbonn A27+, with a general score of 26 against 24.3. Nokia 1600's processor is just as good as the CPU in Karbonn A27+, they have a 0-Core CPU. The Karbonn A27+ features a much more vibrant screen than Nokia 1600, because it has a lot more pixels per inch in the screen.
Karbonn A27+ and Nokia 1600 count with very similar memory capacity to install applications and games. Karbonn A27+ and Nokia 1600 feature quite similar cameras. The Nokia 1600 has a really longer battery performance than Karbonn A27+.
The Nokia 1600 is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.