Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 42.7 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Karbonn | |
| Android 4.0 | -- |
| -- | 2017-10-19 |
| -- | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.17 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 220 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Dual-Core 1000 MHz processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 7.56 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 1.32 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.05 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 2.8 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1800mAh Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 200 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.68 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 XL is much better than Karbonn A35, getting an 82.5 score against 42.7. The Google Pixel 2 XL features a better display than Karbonn A35, because it has a lot better count of pixels per inch in the display, a bigger screen and a much higher resolution of 1440 x 2880. Google Pixel 2 XL has a much better performing processing unit than Karbonn A35, because it has a higher amount of RAM and a higher number of faster cores.
The Google Pixel 2 XL takes much clearer videos and photos than Karbonn A35, because it has a back facing camera with a way higher resolution. The Google Pixel 2 XL has a superior storage to install applications and games than Karbonn A35, although it has no SD extension slot. The Google Pixel 2 XL features a superior battery lifetime than Karbonn A35, because it has a 3520mAh battery capacity.
Even being the best phone in our comparison, Google Pixel 2 XL is also cheap compared to the Karbonn A35.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.