Compare phones
Motorola DROID Turbo
32 GB Metalized Fiber| Global Score | |
| 42.7 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Karbonn | Motorola |
| Android 4.0 | Android 4.4.4 |
| -- | 2014-10-28 |
| -- | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.42 inches |
| -- | 5.96 ounces |
| Black and White | Gray and Red |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 220 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.5 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Dual-Core 1000 MHz processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 7.56 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 1.32 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.05 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 2.8 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1800mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 200 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.68 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola DROID Turbo is much better than Karbonn A35, getting a 76.4 score against 42.7. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola DROID Turbo has a more recent 4.4.4 version while Karbonn A35 has Android 4.0. Motorola DROID Turbo has a way better display than Karbonn A35, because it has a bit bigger screen, a way greater display density and a much better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution.
Motorola DROID Turbo has a much better memory to install games and applications than Karbonn A35, although it has no external memory slot. The Motorola DROID Turbo has a much better performance than Karbonn A35, because it has a greater number of cores , a larger amount of RAM and an extra graphics processor.
Motorola DROID Turbo has a very superior camera than Karbonn A35, because it has a back facing camera with a much better resolution. Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a very superior battery duration than Karbonn A35, because it has a 117% larger battery size.
Motorola DROID Turbo costs a little more than Karbonn A35, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.