Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 42.7 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Karbonn | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.0 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-11-27 |
| -- | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| -- | 6.98 ounces |
| Black and White | Cool blue, Power black and Yellow |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 220 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Dual-Core 1000 MHz processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 7.56 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 1.32 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.05 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 2.8 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1800mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 200 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.68 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco M3 has an overall score of 78.2, which is a lot better than Karbonn A35's general score of 42.7. Both of these phones have Android OS, but Xiaomi Poco M3 has newer 10 version while Karbonn A35 has Android 4.0, providing you lots of additional features and increased performance. Xiaomi Poco M3 features a lot better performance than Karbonn A35, because it has 3,5 GB more RAM and a greater number of cores.
Xiaomi Poco M3 counts with a little bit better display than Karbonn A35, because it has a lot greater pixel quantity per inch of screen, a larger screen and a way higher 1080 x 2340 resolution. The Xiaomi Poco M3 takes greater photos and videos than Karbonn A35, because it has a lot better 48 mega pixels resolution back camera.
The Xiaomi Poco M3 has a way bigger memory to store more apps and games than Karbonn A35, because it has a SD card slot that holds up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Poco M3 features a very superior battery life than Karbonn A35, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 1800mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Xiaomi Poco M3 is also the cheapest one, making buying this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.