Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
3G OnlySM-N9000
| Global Score | |
| 38.4 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Karbonn | Samsung |
| Android 4.2 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| -- | 2013-09-04 |
| 4.56 x 2.43 x 0.41 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 3.25 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 320 x 480 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 165 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa chipset |
| Dual-Core 1000 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz + Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor |
| -- | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Yes GPU | ARM Mali-T628 MP6 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 7.47 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 0 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 3.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.06 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 2.8 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1400mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 240 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | 490 hours standby time 20 hours talk time |
| 3.12 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is way better than Karbonn A52, getting a overall score of 80.7 against 38.4. These phones use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has 5.0 version while Karbonn A52 has Android 4.2 version, counting with some additional features and performance optimizations. Samsung Galaxy Note 3's body is thinner but extremely heavier than Karbonn A52.
Galaxy Note 3 has a much more vibrant screen than Karbonn A52, because it has a way higher resolution of 1920 x 1080px, a way higher pixels number per screen inch and a really larger display. The Galaxy Note 3 counts with a way better hardware performance than Karbonn A52, because it has a higher number of cores (and also faster) and a graphics co-processor.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than Karbonn A52, because it has a SD extension slot that allows up to 64 GB. The Galaxy Note 3 counts with a greater camera than Karbonn A52, because it has a way higher resolution camera in the back. Galaxy Note 3 counts with a way better battery life than Karbonn A52, because it has a 3200mAh battery size instead of 1400mAh.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is also cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.