Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 26.4 | 28.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Karbonn | Motorola |
| -- | 0000-00-00 |
| -- | 4.37 x 1.77 x 0.57 inches |
| -- | 2.82 ounces |
| $ 155.00 | $ 139.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 1.6 inches |
| -- | 128 x 128 pixels |
| -- | STN |
| 441 pixels per inch | 113 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 5.3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| HSPA, EDGE and GPRS | GPRS and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0.9 | 0.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| -- | 940mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 450 hours standby time 9.2 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.48 |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola W230 has an overall score of 28.8, which is slightly better than the Karbonn S9 Titanium's 26.4 score. Motorola W230 has a CPU that's very similar to the CPU in Karbonn S9 Titanium, both have a 0-Core CPU. The Karbonn S9 Titanium has a way better screen than Motorola W230, because it has a much better pixel density.
The Motorola W230 and Karbonn S9 Titanium feature incredibly similar memory capacity for games and applications. The Motorola W230 counts with a really longer battery duration than Karbonn S9 Titanium. Karbonn S9 Titanium and Motorola W230 count with extremely similar cameras.
The Motorola W230 is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.