Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 26.2 | 28.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Karbonn | Motorola |
| -- | 2007-02-12 |
| -- | 4.25 x 1.73 x 0.57 inches |
| -- | 2.75 ounces |
| $ 155.00 | $ 129.00 |
| -- | 128 x 128 pixels |
| -- | STN |
| 441 pixels per inch | 79 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 4.9 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 1,02 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0 | 0.1 |
| HSPA, EDGE and GPRS | GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0.9 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| -- | 850mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 300 hours standby time 10.9 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.32 |
Comparison review
Motorola W205 is slightly better than Karbonn Titanium X, with a general score of 28.1 against 26.2. The Karbonn Titanium X counts with an incredibly better looking screen than Motorola W205, because it has a lot better quantity of pixels per inch of screen. The Motorola W205 features a CPU that's very similar to the Karbonn Titanium X one, they have the same number of cores.
Karbonn Titanium X and Motorola W205 have similar cameras. The Motorola W205 has much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Karbonn Titanium X. Motorola W205 features a very superior battery duration than Karbonn Titanium X.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Motorola W205 is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.