Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 26.2 | 28.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Karbonn | Motorola |
| -- | 0000-00-00 |
| -- | 4.37 x 1.77 x 0.57 inches |
| -- | 2.82 ounces |
| $ 155.00 | $ 139.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 1.6 inches |
| -- | 128 x 128 pixels |
| -- | STN |
| 441 pixels per inch | 113 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 5.3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| HSPA, EDGE and GPRS | GPRS and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0.9 | 0.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| -- | 940mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 450 hours standby time 9.2 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.48 |
Comparison review
Motorola W230 has a global score of 28.8, which is just a bit better than the Karbonn Titanium X's 26.2 global score. The Karbonn Titanium X has a much sharper screen than Motorola W230, because it has a much higher pixels density. The Motorola W230's CPU is very similar to Karbonn Titanium X's processor, both have the same number of cores.
Karbonn Titanium X and Motorola W230 both count with quite similar memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos. The Motorola W230 and Karbonn Titanium X feature incredibly similar cameras. Motorola W230 features a way better battery duration than Karbonn Titanium X.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Motorola W230 is also a bit cheaper, which makes it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.