Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 26.2 | 28 |
| Basic Information | |
| Karbonn | Nokia |
| -- | 2003-10-27 |
| -- | 4.06 x 1.73 x 0.79 inches |
| -- | 3.42 ounces |
| $ 155.00 | $ 135.00 |
| -- | 128 x 128 pixels |
| -- | TFT |
| 441 pixels per inch | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 8,19 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | MMC external memory slot |
| 0 | 0.2 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 0.30 MP |
| 0 | 3.63 |
| HSPA, EDGE and GPRS | EDGE and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0.9 | 0.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| -- | 850mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 300 hours standby time 5 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.32 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 1.1 |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 6230 is a little bit better than the Karbonn Titanium X, having a overall score of 28 against 26.2. Karbonn Titanium X has a lot better screen than Nokia 6230. Nokia 6230's processing unit is just as good as the Karbonn Titanium X one, both have the same number of cores. Nokia 6230 shoots much better photographs and videos than Karbonn Titanium X.
The Nokia 6230 counts with a very superior storage capacity for apps and games than Karbonn Titanium X. Nokia 6230 features a very superior battery performance than Karbonn Titanium X.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Nokia 6230 is also cheap compared to the Karbonn Titanium X.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.