| Global Score | |
| 26.2 | 28.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Karbonn | Nokia |
| -- | Symbian 7.0 |
| -- | 2004-01-15 |
| -- | 4.28 x 2.29 x 0.93 inches |
| -- | 4.37 ounces |
| $ 155.00 | $ 135.00 |
| -- | 176 x 208 pixels |
| -- | TFT |
| 441 pixels per inch | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 12,29 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | MMC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 0 | 1.52 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 0.30 MP |
| 0 | 3.63 |
| HSPA, EDGE and GPRS | EDGE and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0.9 | 0.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| -- | 850mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 192 hours standby time 4 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.32 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 1.1 |
| -- | Infra-red port |
The Nokia 6620 is a bit better than Karbonn Titanium X, getting a general score of 28.2 against 26.2. Karbonn Titanium X has a much better looking display than Nokia 6620. The Nokia 6620 features a processor that is very similar to Karbonn Titanium X's CPU, both have 0 cores. The Nokia 6620 features a very superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Karbonn Titanium X, because it has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 32 GB.
Nokia 6620 has a really longer battery lifetime than Karbonn Titanium X. Nokia 6620 shoots greater pictures and videos than Karbonn Titanium X.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Nokia 6620 is also cheaper.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.