Search


Compare phones

Global Score
26.228.2
Basic Information
KarbonnNokia
--Symbian 7.0
--2004-01-15
--4.28 x 2.29 x 0.93 inches
--4.37 ounces
$ 155.00$ 135.00
--176 x 208 pixels
--TFT
441 pixels per inch--
No touch screenNo touch screen
7.33
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
--12,29 MB internal memory
No SD card slotMMC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot
01.52
Camera
--0.30 MP
03.63
HSPA, EDGE and GPRSEDGE and GSM
--SIM
0.90.3
Battery Life
--850mAh Li-Ion Battery
Non-Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
--192 hours standby time
4 hours talk time
1.362.32
Other Features
--Bluetooth 1.1
--Infra-red port

Comparison review

The Nokia 6620 is a bit better than Karbonn Titanium X, getting a general score of 28.2 against 26.2. Karbonn Titanium X has a much better looking display than Nokia 6620. The Nokia 6620 features a processor that is very similar to Karbonn Titanium X's CPU, both have 0 cores. The Nokia 6620 features a very superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Karbonn Titanium X, because it has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 32 GB.

Nokia 6620 has a really longer battery lifetime than Karbonn Titanium X. Nokia 6620 shoots greater pictures and videos than Karbonn Titanium X.

In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Nokia 6620 is also cheaper.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.