| Global Score | |
| 26.2 | 28.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Karbonn | Nokia |
| -- | Symbian 7.0s |
| -- | 2004-09-28 |
| -- | 4.27 x 2.08 x 0.82 inches |
| -- | 4.16 ounces |
| $ 155.00 | $ 135.00 |
| -- | 176 x 208 pixels |
| -- | TFT |
| 441 pixels per inch | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 8,19 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | RS-MMC external memory slot |
| 0 | 0.2 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 1.00 MP |
| 0 | 4.29 |
| HSPA, EDGE and GPRS | GPRS and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0.9 | 0.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| -- | 900mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 240 hours standby time 4 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.4 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 1.1 |
| -- | GPS |
Nokia 6670 has a global score of 28.4, which is a little bit better than the Karbonn Titanium X's general score of 26.2. The Karbonn Titanium X has a much better screen than Nokia 6670. Nokia 6670 has a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Karbonn Titanium X.
The Nokia 6670 has a processing unit that's just as good as the Karbonn Titanium X one, both have the same number of cores. Nokia 6670 has a superior battery lifetime than Karbonn Titanium X. The Nokia 6670 captures much better photographs and videos than Karbonn Titanium X.
The Nokia 6670 is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also the cheapest one.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.