| Global Score | |
| 26.2 | 28.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Karbonn | Nokia |
| -- | Symbian 9.1 |
| -- | 2005-10-12 |
| -- | 4.60 x 2.74 x 0.55 inches |
| -- | 4.60 ounces |
| $ 155.00 | $ 139.00 |
| -- | 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) |
| -- | TFT |
| 441 pixels per inch | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 3.4 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 76,8 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | miniSD external memory slot |
| 0 | 0.5 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| HSPA, EDGE and GPRS | UMTS, EDGE and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0.9 | 2.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| -- | 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 264 hours standby time 7 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 3.28 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 1.2 |
| -- | Infra-red port |
The Nokia E61 is a little bit better than the Karbonn Titanium X, with a 28.2 score against 26.2. The Karbonn Titanium X and the Nokia E61 feature very similar CPUs, they have a 0-Core CPU. The Karbonn Titanium X features an incredibly better looking display than Nokia E61. Nokia E61 and Karbonn Titanium X both have quite similar cameras.
Nokia E61 counts with a way bigger memory to install games and applications than Karbonn Titanium X. Nokia E61 features a really longer battery lifetime than Karbonn Titanium X.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Nokia E61 is also cheaper than the other phone.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.