Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 21.6 | 23.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Kyocera | Nokia |
| -- | 2002-11-04 |
| 4.37 x 1.96 x 1.02 inches | 4.27 x 1.95 x 0.87 inches |
| 4.23 ounces | 3.67 ounces |
| $ 125.00 | $ 90.00 |
| -- | 128 x 128 pixels |
| -- | LCD |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 2.8 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| CDMA | GPRS and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Ion Battery | 720mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 130 hours standby time 3.5 hours talk time | 225 hours standby time 3.5 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.08 |
| GPS | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
Comparison review
The Nokia 5100 is a bit better than Kyocera 3225, having a 23.2 score against 21.6. Nokia 5100 is a lighter and thinner cellphone than Kyocera 3225. Nokia 5100 and Kyocera 3225 have quite similar CPUs, they have 0 cores. The Nokia 5100 counts with a little bit better screen than Kyocera 3225. The Kyocera 3225 and the Nokia 5100 count with quite similar storage for apps and games.
Nokia 5100 counts with a camera that is very similar to the camera in Kyocera 3225. Nokia 5100 counts with a much better battery performance than Kyocera 3225.
The Nokia 5100 not only is the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.