Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 67.8 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Kyocera | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-11-15 | 2019-05-07 |
| 5.91 x 2.89 x 0.53 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 8.29 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Purple and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 194.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3240mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a has a general score of 78.8, which is better than the Kyocera DuraForce Pro 2's 67.8 score. Although Google Pixel 3a and the Kyocera DuraForce Pro 2 were released only a few months apart, Google Pixel 3a is noticeably thinner and noticeably lighter. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Google Pixel 3a has the previous 11 version while Kyocera DuraForce Pro 2 has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Google Pixel 3a and Kyocera DuraForce Pro 2 have very similar displays, and although the Google Pixel 3a has a quite larger display and a slightly better 1080 x 2220 pixels resolution, they both have a higher count of pixels per display inch. The Kyocera DuraForce Pro 2 features a bit more powerful processing unit than Google Pixel 3a. Both of them have 4 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores.
Kyocera DuraForce Pro 2 has a superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Kyocera DuraForce Pro 2 also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Google Pixel 3a takes much clearer photos and videos than Kyocera DuraForce Pro 2, although it has a lower video definition and a lower 12.2 MP resolution back-facing camera.
Kyocera DuraForce Pro 2 features a little longer battery life than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 3240mAh of battery capacity.
Google Pixel 3a not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also a bit cheaper, making it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.