Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 67.8 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Kyocera | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-11-15 | 2017-06-29 |
| 5.91 x 2.89 x 0.53 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 8.29 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 194.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3240mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto Z2 Play is much better than Kyocera DuraForce Pro 2, having a general score of 77.4 against 67.8. The Moto Z2 Play construction is extremely thinner and notably lighter than the Kyocera DuraForce Pro 2, although it was released just a bit more than a year before. Motorola Moto Z2 Play has a processing unit that's just as good as the Kyocera DuraForce Pro 2 one, both have a Octa-Core processor and 4 GB of RAM.
Kyocera DuraForce Pro 2 has a little bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution, the Kyocera DuraForce Pro 2 also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of screen.
Moto Z2 Play features a better camera than Kyocera DuraForce Pro 2, although it has a back camera with a worse 12 mega pixels resolution and a worse 3840x2160 video resolution. The Moto Z2 Play counts with a much greater storage to store more apps and games than Kyocera DuraForce Pro 2, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Moto Z2 Play also has a SD card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Kyocera DuraForce Pro 2 counts with a bit superior battery performance than Moto Z2 Play, because it has 3240mAh of battery capacity.
The Moto Z2 Play is a bit more expensive than the Kyocera DuraForce Pro 2, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.