Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 67.8 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Kyocera | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-11-15 | 2019-03-15 |
| 5.91 x 2.89 x 0.53 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 8.29 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 194.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3240mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 is way better than the Kyocera DuraForce Pro 2, getting a overall score of 83.8 against 67.8. The Galaxy A50 is a incredibly thinner and notably lighter phone than the Kyocera DuraForce Pro 2, although both of them were only released with a couple of months difference. The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with just a bit better processing power than Kyocera DuraForce Pro 2. Both have 8 cpu cores and a 4 GB RAM memory.
The Kyocera DuraForce Pro 2 counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a really smaller display and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 1920, it also counts with a quite greater pixels count per screen inch. The Samsung Galaxy A50 features a very superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Kyocera DuraForce Pro 2, and although they both have a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 captures greater photographs and videos than Kyocera DuraForce Pro 2, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a back camera with a much better resolution. Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with superior battery lifetime than Kyocera DuraForce Pro 2, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3240mAh.
Galaxy A50 is a bit more expensive than Kyocera DuraForce Pro 2, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.