Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 63.1 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Kyocera | HTC |
| Android 7.1 Nougat, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 5.0 |
| 2016-08-31 | 2015-03-01 |
| 5.84 x 2.80 x 0.51 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 8.10 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 182.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| -- | S-LCD 3 |
| 441 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3240mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 5.2 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
HTC One M9 has an overall score of 77.7, which is much better than Kyocera DuraForce Pro's global score of 63.1. Both phones we compare here use Android operating system, but the HTC One M9 has the previous 5.0 version while Kyocera DuraForce Pro has Android 7.1 Nougat. Despite of the fact that the HTC One M9 is older than Kyocera DuraForce Pro, it's construction is incredibly thinner and lighter.
HTC One M9 counts with a faster processing unit than Kyocera DuraForce Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the HTC One M9 also has an extra graphics processor, more RAM and a 64-bits processor. The HTC One M9 counts with a better screen than Kyocera DuraForce Pro. They have a better pixel amount per inch of display, a display of the same size and the same exact 1920 x 1080 resolution.
HTC One M9 captures better photographs and videos than Kyocera DuraForce Pro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for low light images and video, it also counts with a lot better 20 megapixels resolution back camera and a way higher 3840x2160 video quality. The Kyocera DuraForce Pro has just a bit bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Kyocera DuraForce Pro also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 256 GB.
Kyocera DuraForce Pro counts with a little longer battery life than HTC One M9, because it has 3240mAh of battery capacity against 2840mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the HTC One M9 is also cheap compared to the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.