Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Kyocera | Apple |
| Android 10 | iOS 14.x |
| 2021-01-20 | 2020-11-13 |
| 6.50 x 2.95 x 0.63 inches | 5.18 x 2.53 x 0.29 inches |
| 9.81 ounces | 4.76 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Green, Purple, Red and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | OLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 477 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7150-AB chipset | Apple A14 Bionic chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit, 5 nm (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2227mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 12 mini has a score of 88.5, which is much better than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra's 72.2 score. Even when the Apple iPhone 12 mini and the Kyocera DuraForce Ultra were released only 2 months apart, the Apple iPhone 12 mini is extremely lighter and incredibly thinner. The Apple iPhone 12 mini counts with iOS 14.x OS, while Kyocera DuraForce Ultra has Android 10 OS.
Apple iPhone 12 mini has a greater processing power than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, because although it has an inferior number of cores and less RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit. Apple iPhone 12 mini has a brighter display than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch in the display and a quite better 1080 x 2340 resolution.
The Kyocera DuraForce Ultra has a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than iPhone 12 mini, because it has more internal memory and an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The Kyocera DuraForce Ultra features a way better battery lifetime than iPhone 12 mini, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
The iPhone 12 mini captures much better photos and videos than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, because although it has a lot less mega pixels resolution camera in the back and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better captures in low-light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.