Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Kyocera | Apple |
| Android 10 | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2021-01-20 | 2020-11-13 |
| 6.50 x 2.95 x 0.63 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches |
| 9.81 ounces | 8.03 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| LCD | OLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7150-AB chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3687mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 12 Pro Max is a lot better than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, getting a 93.2 score against 72.2. IPhone 12 Pro Max counts with iOS 15.x OS, and Kyocera DuraForce Ultra counts with Android 10 OS. Even when iPhone 12 Pro Max and the Kyocera DuraForce Ultra were released with only a couple of months difference, iPhone 12 Pro Max is lighter and noticeably thinner.
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max counts with a better performance than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster), and they both have 6 GB of RAM, the Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max also counts with a 64 bits CPU. The iPhone 12 Pro Max counts with a sharper display than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, because it has a quite better pixels amount per inch of screen, a higher 1284 x 2778 pixels resolution and a bigger display.
The iPhone 12 Pro Max takes much clearer videos and photos than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 video resolution and a camera with way less megapixels, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better captures and videos in poorly lited environments. The Kyocera DuraForce Ultra counts with a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Kyocera DuraForce Ultra also has a SD memory slot that allows up to 1 TB.
Kyocera DuraForce Ultra features superior battery performance than iPhone 12 Pro Max, because it has a 22% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.