Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Kyocera | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2021-01-20 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.50 x 2.95 x 0.63 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.81 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| -- | Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| LCD | OLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7150-AB chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X is way better than the Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, having a general score of 88.1 against 72.2. The iPhone X is an older phone than the Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, but Apple made it noticeably lighter and notably thinner. The iPhone X features a bit more powerful processor than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, because although it has 2 lesser and slower cores and 3 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
The iPhone X has a slightly better display than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, because it has a little larger display, a slightly higher resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels and a little better pixel density. The Apple iPhone X has a much better camera than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, although it has a lower 3840x2160 video definition and a back camera with lot less megapixels resolution, they both have the same aperture.
The Kyocera DuraForce Ultra features more storage for applications and games than iPhone X, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Kyocera DuraForce Ultra counts with a much longer battery life than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.