Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Kyocera | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2021-01-20 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.50 x 2.95 x 0.63 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 9.81 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gray and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| LCD | AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel has a global score of 80.2, which is much better than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra's 72.2 score. Google Pixel is an notably older phone than the Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, but it is incredibly lighter and notably thinner anyway. Kyocera DuraForce Ultra features a little better processing power than Google Pixel, because it has 2 GB more RAM and a higher number of cores.
The Kyocera DuraForce Ultra has a little more vivid screen than Google Pixel, because although it has a quite inferior quantity of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a little bit larger display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2160px. The Kyocera DuraForce Ultra has much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Kyocera DuraForce Ultra also has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
Kyocera DuraForce Ultra has a really longer battery performance than Google Pixel, because it has a 62 percent more battery size. Google Pixel takes better photos and videos than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for capturing images or video in poorly lited situations, a worse 3840x2160 video resolution and a lot less megapixels resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.