Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Kyocera | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2021-01-20 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.50 x 2.95 x 0.63 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.81 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | P-OLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 XL is better than the Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, with an 82.5 score against 72.2. Despite of the fact that the Google Pixel 2 XL is older than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, it's body is incredibly thinner and noticeably lighter. Google Pixel 2 XL has a little bit better looking display than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, because it has a better 1440 x 2880 resolution, a just a bit greater number of pixels in each display inch and a bit larger screen.
The Kyocera DuraForce Ultra features a little bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Kyocera DuraForce Ultra also has more RAM memory. Kyocera DuraForce Ultra features a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Kyocera DuraForce Ultra also has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
Kyocera DuraForce Ultra features improved battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3520mAh. Google Pixel 2 XL captures much clearer photos and videos than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, although it has a much worse resolution back facing camera and a worse video definition, they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.