Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Kyocera | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2021-01-20 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.50 x 2.95 x 0.63 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.81 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | P-OLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 has a general score of 80, which is better than the Kyocera DuraForce Ultra's global score of 72.2. Despite of the fact that Google Pixel 3 is incredibly older than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, it's design is incredibly thinner and lighter. Kyocera DuraForce Ultra and Google Pixel 3 have extremely similar processors, and although the Google Pixel 3 has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Google Pixel 3 features a display that's just as good as the display in Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, they have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels, the same quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a same size screen. The Kyocera DuraForce Ultra counts with a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has more internal storage and a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
The Kyocera DuraForce Ultra has a way better battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2915mAh. Google Pixel 3 shoots better photographs and videos than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, although it has a camera with a lot lower resolution and a lower video definition, they both have a same size aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.