Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Kyocera | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-01-20 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.50 x 2.95 x 0.63 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.81 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| -- | Black, Purple and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | OLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a XL is just a bit better than the Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, with a general score of 78.9 against 72.2. Even though the Google Pixel 3a XL is older than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, it's design is much lighter and way thinner. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but the Google Pixel 3a XL has a newer 11 version and Kyocera DuraForce Ultra has Android 10 version.
The Kyocera DuraForce Ultra counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Kyocera DuraForce Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Kyocera DuraForce Ultra has a little bit better looking display than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels, the Kyocera DuraForce Ultra also counts with a little better display pixels density.
The Kyocera DuraForce Ultra features a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage. Google Pixel 3a XL counts with a much better camera than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, although it has a back-facing camera with way less mega pixels and a lower 3840x2160 video resolution, they both have the same aperture.
Kyocera DuraForce Ultra has longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.